Jump to content
The mkiv Supra Owners Club

First impression PHR stage 3


JamieP
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 91
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Sorry to hear that Jamie, try the 4088R, am I right in thinking you'd have less trouble running antilag on one of them due to them being DBB?

 

 

 

Ive been in a gt4088r a few times and over lapped the dyno graphs with mine, the extra cost dont really warrent the effort imo but as i have all the water pipes now i may go that way, as i said ive not given up on this one yet.;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry to hear you are having stress matey, but it's an interesting read. I'm inches away from ordering up a 4088 dbb for myself, but now I need to know how you guys get on with the .96 housing over the 81.. I'll be keeping a look out!

 

The vids and stats jamie has posted so far look very impressive for this tubby.

 

I think we all owe Jamie a big debt of gratitude, spending all his hard earned cash and finding all the best bits for us to invest in!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jamie , running a larger turbo like the 72mm trim version is totally different to your gt4088, because its the physical size , remember the gt4088 is only a 64mm turbo , you will get more lag with the 72mm turbo's . These turbo's will have more grunt top end then the gt4088 , yes i have been thinking about changing down aswell , but trying to look at a happy medium. A 67mm turbo seems the better way forward, but i like the motorway pulls rather then racing around the streets . Iam changing to a 71gtsdbb , this is supposed to spool just like a 67mm turbo , but pulls much harder at the top end.

 

If that fails i have a gt4088 on standby :-))

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea i understand this is will be more laggy and i could live with that if it had the top end power but at the same boost as the gt4088 its down on power, there must be something wrong with this turbo and ill be taking it back to the seller first chance i get.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jamie , running a larger turbo like the 72mm trim version is totally different to your gt4088, because its the physical size , remember the gt4088 is only a 64mm turbo , you will get more lag with the 72mm turbo's .

 

Michel.. do mean the turbine diameter? the 4088R is 77mm, no?;

 

http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarrett/catelog/Turbochargers/GT40/GT4088R.htm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't believe that the PHR 3 isn't performing very well mate, seems odd :confused:

 

Indeed if it's got all its blades (which I assume Jamie has checked) there's not a lot more to it.

 

I'd suspect the map hasn't been optimised for it yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Indeed if it's got all its blades (which I assume Jamie has checked) there's not a lot more to it.

 

I'd suspect the map hasn't been optimised for it yet.

 

Compressor blades are fine, hotside look fine but without pulling the cartridge apart i cant say for for sure, What i cant get my head round is how the gt4088 looks bigger spools MUCH faster and is 90bhp up on this at 1.2bar, the new 1.2bar map is just fine.

Im not wasteing time and money mapping this any further.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Arnt you only going to see a real big difference in performance to run higher boost on a larger turbo like this?

 

 

 

No, at the same boost the bigger turbo should make more power, 0.2 bar (would normally run 1.4bar on the street) aint gonna make that much difference imo 50-70bhp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it would be helpful if Paul posted his results with the turbo as it does seem down on what it should be producing.

 

Correct that a larger turbo will flow more air at the same pressure but I imagine at 1bar this thing is just starting to spin up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Correct that a larger turbo will flow more air at the same pressure but I imagine at 1bar this thing is just starting to spin up.

This is what I was getting at, its not as close to its optimum as a smaller turbo would be. I dunno :innocent: I'm sure Paul can set things straight with you :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. You might also be interested in our Guidelines, Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.