Noz Posted March 5, 2011 Share Posted March 5, 2011 Hey guys i read a SZ-R review and some of you may have seen it before but I was just curious to how this guy reckons he's doing super speeds on a stock NA? he's bought a SZR and plans to change the engine for a TT but reckons it will ditch evo's? he reckons its 290BHP but then goes on to say he's going to have the TwinTurbo conversion DONE, as if its not already in there? im confused . . . http://www.carsurvey.org/reviews/toyota/supra/r127894/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Posted March 5, 2011 Share Posted March 5, 2011 Do you notice the "about" before the 0-60 claim? There are a few members like this on the forum bud. They wish to live with their head in the clouds. If the guy does do a TT conversion he will then claim 500hp and 0-60 in 3.5 seconds, ditching the fastest of supercars in it's wake. Either that or he has got his hands on some very nice green. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnny g Posted March 5, 2011 Share Posted March 5, 2011 Depends how big a drop it is I guess Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Posted March 5, 2011 Share Posted March 5, 2011 Depends how big a drop it is I guess Still wouldn't manage it. Initial speed = 0 Final speed = 60 Time = 5.5 Acceleration = 60/5.5 = 10.909m/s/s Gravity = 9.81m/s/s Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnny g Posted March 5, 2011 Share Posted March 5, 2011 10% speedo error Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guigsy Posted March 5, 2011 Share Posted March 5, 2011 A 400bhp t67 bpu... Hum Struggle to see how an na has a 0-60 time almost the same as a stock tt with 60 less bhp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Posted March 5, 2011 Share Posted March 5, 2011 A 400bhp t67 bpu... Hum Struggle to see how an na has a 0-60 time almost the same as a stock tt with 60 less bhp 60 less? Try 100 less Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
w41k3r Posted March 5, 2011 Share Posted March 5, 2011 I have an n/a i was running with the open diff and i always had trouble of the line but it still managed to get its self moving ive now switch to the torsen diff is it the a01b maybe?? and i would say its an essential!!!! to moving these cars off, no wheel spin now and ive dropped 30 mm width on the rear tyres too i feel this is the n/a`s weak point the open diff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guigsy Posted March 5, 2011 Share Posted March 5, 2011 60 less? Try 100 less I was going on his claimed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Posted March 5, 2011 Share Posted March 5, 2011 I was going on his claimed Stock TT is approx 320 though, meaning 30hp difference Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
straightsix Posted March 5, 2011 Share Posted March 5, 2011 I remember someone posted up on here a thread from some guy on the Astra or Vauxhall owners club. He managed superb performance by taking his back seats out..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dnk Posted March 5, 2011 Share Posted March 5, 2011 I have an n/a i was running with the open diff and i always had trouble of the line but it still managed to get its self moving ive now switch to the torsen diff is it the a01b maybe?? and i would say its an essential!!!! to moving these cars off, no wheel spin now and ive dropped 30 mm width on the rear tyres too i feel this is the n/a`s weak point the open diff Pretty sure the weak point is a lack of turbo's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
w41k3r Posted March 5, 2011 Share Posted March 5, 2011 Pretty sure the weak point is a lack of turbo's haha very clever yeah it doesnt do to bad for a big car in all fairness though, but even im strapping a turbo on mine now... it is true what people say everybody just expects the supra to be a turbo car Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abz Posted March 5, 2011 Share Posted March 5, 2011 Maybe his using NOS? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dnk Posted March 5, 2011 Share Posted March 5, 2011 haha very clever yeah it doesnt do to bad for a big car in all fairness though, but even im strapping a turbo on mine now... it is true what people say everybody just expects the supra to be a turbo car I couldnt resist sorry Its the same when you look back at a stock tt from going full bpu, i find it hard to believe i thought a stock tt was quick as now it feels slow, it's the same when you go from bpu to a decent single, i drove one with approx 650 and it felt insane compared to a bpu, god knows how mad 800 + is Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noz Posted March 5, 2011 Author Share Posted March 5, 2011 BPU NA lol the things dreams are made of. think il start saving the pennies and get myself some power :-( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supra Gaz Posted March 5, 2011 Share Posted March 5, 2011 it says he has veilside kit fitted, that tells me he knows sod all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nic Posted March 5, 2011 Share Posted March 5, 2011 (edited) im confused . . . Badly written, misleading review full of errors and false/wildly exaggerated claims. Edited March 5, 2011 by Nic (see edit history) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ripped_fear Posted March 5, 2011 Share Posted March 5, 2011 I remember someone posted up on here a thread from some guy on the Astra or Vauxhall owners club. He managed superb performance by taking his back seats out..... i remember this guy but he did have an induction kit too! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian C Posted March 5, 2011 Share Posted March 5, 2011 I remember someone posted up on here a thread from some guy on the Astra or Vauxhall owners club. He managed superb performance by taking his back seats out..... Aren't you thinking of the plank who put his back seat DOWN, rather than removed it? And claimed it made the car weigh less? The rationale was, you lie flat on quicksand and don't sink, ergo you weigh less, so if you lie the back seat down it'll weight less, car goes faster. His arse-dyno apparently PROVED the results, oh yes. Sounds like the kind of idiot who thinks the plane wouldn't take off Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Havard Posted March 5, 2011 Share Posted March 5, 2011 If this guy has emptied his ash trays and put nitrogen in his tyres then he may be right..!! H. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noz Posted March 6, 2011 Author Share Posted March 6, 2011 i have a mate who just bought an st185 and claims BHP with no dyno, dont understand why people do it. i have a cat back 2.5" exhaust and panel filter and have never claimed anything but the standard bhp which always decreases after time anyway? i have a mate with an MX5 who changed his HT leads, upgraded spark plugs, and MOTORWORLD air filter claimed extra bhp once he got it dyno'ed it was MUCH LESS than stock lol classic!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now