Homer Posted May 9, 2009 Share Posted May 9, 2009 To save this from getting lost in the long SRR thread, here's the results from the day so far (Please PM me with your results if you're not listed): [table=head]Name|Spec|Trans|Turbo|Boost|FWHP|FWTorque Gledo|Single|6spd|GT4094|1.7|683 bhp|560 lb/ft JamieP|Single|6spd|T67dbb Boostlogic|1.8|632 bhp|545 lb/ft Pig|Single|6spd|T61 Boostlogic|1.7|604 bhp|540 lb/ft Bignum|Single|6spd|PHR stage2+|1.35|520 bhp|480 lb/ft Magictorch|TT|6spd|Stock|1.25|431 bhp|440 lb/ft Ark|TT|6spd|Hybrid|1.2|419 bhp|400 lb/ft Vagnum|TT|6spd|Stock|1.1|405 bhp|395 lb/ft dannyspeed|TT|Auto|Stock|1.1|397 bhp|384 lb/ft adnanshah247|TT|6spd|Stock|0.7|342 bhp|322 lb/ft Magnos|TT|6spd|Stock UK|0.6|332 bhp|276 lb/ft Ellis|TT|Auto|Stock|0.7|324 bhp|322 lb/ft Ben SZ-R|NA|6spd|-|-|221 bhp|204 lb/ft Budz86|NA|5spd|-|-|218 bhp|190 lb/ft AlexM|NA|Auto|-|-|209 bhp|206 lb/ft sc_dragon|NA|Auto|-|-|202 bhp|162 lb/ft [/table] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexM Posted May 9, 2009 Share Posted May 9, 2009 It you sort it by name, I came second! Who needs turbos. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adnanshah247 Posted May 9, 2009 Share Posted May 9, 2009 It you sort it by name, I came second! Who needs turbos. and i came first! who needs single?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarlT67 Posted May 9, 2009 Share Posted May 9, 2009 who needs single?! After seeing them today me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adnanshah247 Posted May 9, 2009 Share Posted May 9, 2009 After seeing them today me your not the only one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tooquicktostop Posted May 9, 2009 Share Posted May 9, 2009 Nah singles are over rated Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chingy Posted May 9, 2009 Share Posted May 9, 2009 some great figures there, well done to magictorch on stocks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sc_dragon Posted May 9, 2009 Share Posted May 9, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JODY T Posted May 10, 2009 Share Posted May 10, 2009 430 from a tt, are they not all about 20hp up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homer Posted May 10, 2009 Author Share Posted May 10, 2009 430 from a tt, are they not all about 20hp up I think adnan read his boost reading wrong, Ark's is bang on, magictorches car is a little bit special on the spec I'll let him fill in the details Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JODY T Posted May 10, 2009 Share Posted May 10, 2009 ahh i see Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magictorch Posted May 10, 2009 Share Posted May 10, 2009 Magictorch's car is a little bit special on the spec I'll let him fill in the details I have a Solaris Ecu, Greddy 3 row and Phr stage 2 fuel kit:) Otherwise the car is stock Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wez Posted May 10, 2009 Share Posted May 10, 2009 I have a Solaris Ecu, Greddy 3 row and Phr stage 2 fuel kit:) Otherwise the car is stock Also running TTC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luxluc Posted May 10, 2009 Share Posted May 10, 2009 I have a Solaris Ecu, Greddy 3 row and Phr stage 2 fuel kit:) Otherwise the car is stock That's a special combination for a TT setup. Nice bhp figure on stock turbos Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supra-Brett Posted May 10, 2009 Share Posted May 10, 2009 I have a Solaris Ecu, Greddy 3 row and Phr stage 2 fuel kit:) Otherwise the car is stock Excuse my ignorance but why is that so special ? I thought BPU was roughly, walbro pump or similar, upped boost, FMIC etc, and that stock tubbies struggled to get above 400BHP ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamieP Posted May 10, 2009 Share Posted May 10, 2009 Excuse my ignorance but why is that so special ? I thought BPU was roughly, walbro pump or similar, upped boost, FMIC etc, and that stock tubbies struggled to get above 400BHP ? The ecu and mapping means it can be fine tunned for the best figures. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian W Posted May 10, 2009 Share Posted May 10, 2009 The ecu and mapping means it can be fine tunned for the best figures. That and the fact he runs the tubbies in parallel? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamieP Posted May 10, 2009 Share Posted May 10, 2009 That and the fact he runs the tubbies in parallel? He asked whats "special", anyone can run parallel but it costs big bucks to buy and map a solaris. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian W Posted May 10, 2009 Share Posted May 10, 2009 He asked whats "special", anyone can run parallel but it costs big bucks to buy and map a solaris. Granted, but if he was running the tubbies in sequential then he wouldn't have made the figure he did no? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jurgen-Jm-Imports Posted May 10, 2009 Share Posted May 10, 2009 awesome magictorch:) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kopite Posted May 10, 2009 Share Posted May 10, 2009 Granted, but if he was running the tubbies in sequential then he wouldn't have made the figure he did no? Think all JP is trying to say is that the "special" part was the fact it's on stock twins with a full standalone ECU - not many of those about so lots of tuning potential. The car being in TTC or seqential wasn't part of the "special" spec Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian W Posted May 10, 2009 Share Posted May 10, 2009 Think all JP is trying to say is that the "special" part was the fact it's on stock twins with a full standalone ECU - not many of those about so lots of tuning potential. The car being in TTC or seqential wasn't part of the "special" spec I know what JP was trying to say, and he was spot on with it with regards to answering Brett's question. Just saying that the TTC contributed to the excellent figure Magictorch achieved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kopite Posted May 10, 2009 Share Posted May 10, 2009 Has anyone dyno'd a car with sequential turbos and then redyno'd with TTC? At the top end, shouldn't be much in it should there? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian W Posted May 10, 2009 Share Posted May 10, 2009 Has anyone dyno'd a car with sequential turbos and then redyno'd with TTC? At the top end, shouldn't be much in it should there? Would be interesting to see. If there isn't then it makes the figure even more impressive for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kopite Posted May 10, 2009 Share Posted May 10, 2009 Would be interesting to see. If there isn't then it makes the figure even more impressive for me. In a 4th gear pull around 5k rpm (or wherever peak power was) then both turbos should be on regardless of whether it's in sequential or TTC so would expect the same, would be interesting to hear what Ryan says Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now