Jump to content
The mkiv Supra Owners Club

N/A tuning options


silver_bullet
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Lol. More of a gut like Bristow:D I think its been a long hot day and everyone is bored at work. I dont think anyone in this thread meant any disrespect to anyone else:) At the end of the day we all have differant opinions and ideas. Me, full decat, nics manifold and thats about it:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol. More of a gut like Bristow:D I think its been a long hot day and everyone is bored at work. I dont think anyone in this thread meant any disrespect to anyone else:) At the end of the day we all have differant opinions and ideas. Me, full decat, nics manifold and thats about it:)

 

Oh fully agree with you there...

 

I'm a laid back guy (I've got kids they generate enough stress on their own *grin*)....

 

No offence was meant towards anyone, rather just a heated debate on a subject which none of us are experts. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I had an NA I would do the following (in no particular order), to get the best out of it.

 

1. Service (fluids, filter, plugs, etc.) to ensure everything is in good working condition to start with.

2. New O2 sensors to ensure correct fueling.

3. Cat back exhaust (quietest I could find eg. Blitz RX, Tanabe Medalion Touring, Greddy MX etc.)

4. 2nd decat pipe

5. Tubular manifold

6. Emanage Ultimate mapped by Ian C

7. Bigger spec Supra brakes, quality pads, decent fluid, braided lines, possibly also upgrade the master cylinder.

8. Front and rear Carbing braces (front one including master cylinder stopper to help with brake pedal feel).

9. Quality suspension setup.

10. Quality set of lightweight wheels and decent tyres.

 

I'd look at performance as in the overall package, rather than just hp figure, ie. getting the engine running as well as possible, good braking and quality handling.

 

:Plug: Pics of the tubular manifold for anyone who has not seen yet.

 

http://img98.imageshack.us/img98/8473/p1030161sa4.jpg

 

http://img89.imageshack.us/img89/1831/p1030162uk1.jpg

 

http://img143.imageshack.us/img143/7632/dsc00305dl3.jpg

http://img242.imageshack.us/img242/1738/dsc00307xs0.jpg

http://img142.imageshack.us/img142/3957/dsc00312gm4.jpg

http://img83.imageshack.us/img83/1491/dsc00313hh4.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quoting snipped, but the N/A block is NOT cast like a TT, I have now cut them both up, and they are quite different, lack of piston cooling squirters aside.

 

Ah in that case I will stand corrected on this.. What are the main differences. Glad that question has finally been answered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thinner head face deck, thinner bore walls, particularly at the top and bottom, generally less "beefy" Even cast iron costs money, and car makers don't use any more than necessary for the blocks envisaged usage. I must weigh the two types of block, I imagine the differences will show up on the scales quite clearly. I posted pics of a Skyline head I band sawed in bits on a forum, and now I find the pics accredited to some Yank "expert", so I am not taking any and posting them :) get your own hack saw out ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thinner head face deck, thinner bore walls, particularly at the top and bottom, generally less "beefy" Even cast iron costs money, and car makers don't use any more than necessary for the blocks envisaged usage. I must weigh the two types of block, I imagine the differences will show up on the scales quite clearly. I posted pics of a Skyline head I band sawed in bits on a forum, and now I find the pics accredited to some Yank "expert", so I am not taking any and posting them :) get your own hack saw out ;)

 

I'm not going to doubt you in the slightest... would be nice to see the pics, but I can understand your concern.

 

That is another theory regarding the engines that has been debunked.. Any areas show any obvious weak spots?

 

Just curious for the 10k RPM experiment..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not going to doubt you in the slightest... would be nice to see the pics, but I can understand your concern.

 

That is another theory regarding the engines that has been debunked.. Any areas show any obvious weak spots?

 

Just curious for the 10k RPM experiment..

 

For a turbo conversion of modest power levels it should (and certainly appears to be in real life) fine, but for a mega BHP engine I'd only want to use the TT block. Nissan found the stock Skyline blocks wanting (again people claim a stock block is reliable to silly power figures, which they might be for a sub 10 second run through the gears, or an inertia dyno "power run", but not for endurance racing). So they came up with the N1 block with a thicker bore wall thickness, and the rare GT block, which has a much thicker head deck, too. I don't believe Toyota, or TRD ever used the 2JZ-GTE in any serious competition so they probably had no incentive to produce a stronger TT block.

 

For your high revving N/A conversion the very long stroke and rod length of the 2JZ family will conspire against you, and I don't believe 10,000 RPM or anything near it is achievable with any reliability whatsoever. You'd be better shortening the stroke with either custom crank and rods, or even basing it on a 1JZ engine. Pics of the Nissan race blocks below. I couldn't justify the 5k plus UK pounds for a GT block, so went with an N1 block for my effort ;)

gt1.jpg

gt2.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder how much power you'd get pulling that back to 13:1 AFRs :)

 

And what cams are you looking at? I've got a 272 intake if it'll fit haha :D

 

-Ian

 

Here you go...

 

Here is a dyno plot of my NA at a recent rolling road day, I've attached the graph showing the AFR's (Air fuel ratio)...

 

As you can see they are certainly not running lean at the top end, so there is plenty of headroom left with the fueling system. I would recommend rather using something such as an emanage (which has the same fueling aspect as the SAFC but in a higher resolution), but also has ignition control which is where you can scrape more power out of.

 

Going one step further, you could use an emanage ultimate and slightly pull fuel out to bring it closer to stoich and not loose power that way BUT you will be using up your safety margain when it comes to detonation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. You might also be interested in our Guidelines, Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.