wkdtime Posted September 27, 2006 Share Posted September 27, 2006 I suspect he means 304BHP at the wheels. I guess your right, so he would make around 320BHP at the fly due to less transmission loss compared to the auto's. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobbeh Posted September 27, 2006 Share Posted September 27, 2006 I suspect he means 304BHP at the wheels. On what kind of dyno? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Posted September 27, 2006 Share Posted September 27, 2006 I guess your right, so he would make around 320BHP at the fly due to less transmission loss compared to the auto's. more like 350-360bhp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorin Posted September 27, 2006 Share Posted September 27, 2006 On what kind of dyno? On one of them that measures rear wheel horsepower Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJ Posted September 27, 2006 Share Posted September 27, 2006 On one of them that measures rear wheel horsepower Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobbeh Posted September 27, 2006 Share Posted September 27, 2006 On one of them that measures rear wheel horsepower Well sadly for him its a load of crap if hes been told that and is running stock boost Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJ Posted September 27, 2006 Share Posted September 27, 2006 Well sadly for him its a load of crap if hes been told that and is running stock boost But the point of the post was not to brag about figures (right or wrong) it as to show the difference in the figure before and after using the same dyno and the same (more or less) conditions Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobbeh Posted September 27, 2006 Share Posted September 27, 2006 I know m8, I'm not getting involved in the SMIC debate Sounds to me like it was recorded at the wheels and calculated into a flywheel figure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragonball Posted September 27, 2006 Share Posted September 27, 2006 Thanks for that Jay - glad it all worked well Will email the address to post the dyno results down..I'll scan them then Cheers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ivan Posted September 27, 2006 Share Posted September 27, 2006 I don't see what all the arguments are about. I don't expect increased figures from a replacement product (especially one that never claimed to increase them in the first place). All I expect of it is to bring the performance back up to somewhere near stock figures and to be reliable. £300 to replace my knackered SMIC compared to Mr T's price is a bloody bargain and I can't wait for mine to arrive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gazboy Posted September 28, 2006 Share Posted September 28, 2006 I've deffo got to get me one of these. I'll do before and after runs at G-Force too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lockys96 Posted September 28, 2006 Share Posted September 28, 2006 nope fella's my figure was 304 at fly. the atw figure was 251 i know i still have cats, but surely a filter, cat back exhaust and large fmic should give more, like you said, you got 322 on standard with ures, and no fmic. so im around 20ponies down with a fmic. i am getting a new exhaust before 1st november, as car needs new mot, and there is a rather large hole and crack in the superdragger. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobbeh Posted September 28, 2006 Share Posted September 28, 2006 I dont think you're that much down, didnt tom get 255rwhp on his JDM 6 speed? Sound about right to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Class One Posted September 28, 2006 Share Posted September 28, 2006 And I got 262 at wheel hp on my JDM auto with only a panel filter as a mod at the time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nic Posted September 28, 2006 Share Posted September 28, 2006 When i was picking up parts from Toyota yesterday i got them to price up a side mount for me without discount it was £880 You should have asked me Col, see THIS POST Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matti85 Posted September 28, 2006 Share Posted September 28, 2006 Paul so when do you expect these SMIC to arrive ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobbeh Posted September 28, 2006 Share Posted September 28, 2006 I've deffo got to get me one of these. I'll do before and after runs at G-Force too. Now thats a rolling road I recommend Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorin Posted September 28, 2006 Share Posted September 28, 2006 Now thats a rolling road I recommend Is it one of them that measures rear wheel horsepower? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lockys96 Posted September 28, 2006 Share Posted September 28, 2006 And I got 262 at wheel hp on my JDM auto with only a panel filter as a mod at the time. exacto. mines a 6speed, i thought the auto's had slight more drive loss Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Posted September 28, 2006 Share Posted September 28, 2006 I dont think you're that much down, didnt tom get 255rwhp on his JDM 6 speed? Sound about right to me. yep, bang on, apparently 321@fly with filter and catback. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobbeh Posted September 28, 2006 Share Posted September 28, 2006 If you got that then what did my 100% standard Supra get with 265rwhp.. It wasnt over 335 BHP thats for sure. ... and yes Thorin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gazboy Posted September 28, 2006 Share Posted September 28, 2006 My boggo auto did 250rwhp. With double decats but stock exhuats it pulled 275rwhp. If that's any use to you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobbeh Posted September 28, 2006 Share Posted September 28, 2006 None of it is any use Its all a load of numbers that dont ever seem to prove anything useful on here Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragonball Posted September 28, 2006 Share Posted September 28, 2006 None of it is any use Its all a load of numbers that dont ever seem to prove anything useful on here Yeah that... Just the increases! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homer Posted September 28, 2006 Share Posted September 28, 2006 I've got before and after dyno plots (and plotted a comparison) of stock IC vs Greddy 3-row. They weren't done the same month, but at the same rolling road. The results from that rolling road have been incredibly consistent since. Is that of interest to anyone or does that just help show that any new IC is better than a knakered old one? Edited to add - the on-the-road performance of going to the Greddy was immediate and considerable when above 5k rpm. A massive difference over the stock unit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.