Supra-Brett Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 If any NA owners in the Reading area want to borrow a decent accelerometer to record some accurate times, you're quite welcome to borrow mine. Provided it fixed correctly it's extremely accurate Homer, i am willing to give this a go, but before i do, let me get my excuses ready for my slow N/A. 1) Its got loads of ICE in it, sound deadening etc 2) bumpy road 3) bad start 4) Kanackered accelerometer On a serious note. next reading Jap meet ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
razza Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 get those excuses out now lol!! When you next training? I can give you a lift this time for your first run in a TT;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECK Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 i have a tomtom sat-nav and when it is in my supra it is exactly 5 mph out from my speedo, my speedo will read 70mph and the tomtom reads 65/66mph it jumps between the two now i know that i have a good supra N/A as i have ran a 14.89 at crail which admitantly isnt the best track in the world but it is still timed better than a you tube video now to settle this i am willing to do a run and record it, then post it up as for the claims of a sub 6 sec 0-60 i think it just really isnt possiable, i mean really isnt:taped: i really just cannot even imagine beating 7.5 sec 0-60 (goes off to find vid camera) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supra-Brett Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 get those excuses out now lol!! When you next training? I can give you a lift this time for your first run in a TT;) In a few weeks time Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dangerous brain Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 now i know that i have a good supra N/A as i have ran a 14.89 at crail which admitantly isnt the best track in the world but it is still timed better than a you tube video Hang on a mo. You got a 14.89 1/4 in an N/A and people are saying that a TT running a 14.2-3 is about normal in another thread. Is that basically saying that the N/A can run similar 1/4s to the TT? Surely thats not right as there is the best part of 70-90 BHP difference. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supra-Brett Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 Hang on a mo. You got a 14.89 1/4 in an N/A and people are saying that a TT running a 14.2-3 is about normal in another thread. Is that basically saying that the N/A can run similar 1/4s to the TT? Surely thats not right as there is the best part of 70-90 BHP difference. Thats a time for a good N/A and poor TTs ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homer Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 Thats a time for a good N/A and poor TTs ? It's an exceptionally good time for an NA and according to Monkeymarks drag times it only had a decat. TT's in this time range are rare and to be honest a pretty poor show (I beat it even with Slip control on ) I would encourage folks to have a look at the timeslip details in that thread if you want to get an idea of the difference a second can make in terms of terminal speed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 I was reading earlier and i noticed some people were getting terminals of around 101 etc. A std TT should be getting around 107-110, if they are decent. Scott =op Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECK Posted February 14, 2008 Share Posted February 14, 2008 Hang on a mo. You got a 14.89 1/4 in an N/A and people are saying that a TT running a 14.2-3 is about normal in another thread. Is that basically saying that the N/A can run similar 1/4s to the TT? Surely thats not right as there is the best part of 70-90 BHP difference. woops!!! appoliages to all it was a 15.2sec:blink: ive just been bact to check it and i was wrong soz;) ALEX HAMILTON 15.225 sec sec 0.434 sec 2.354 sec 90.0 mph mph Right lane http://www.crailraceway.co.uk/show_times.asp?CarNumber=126&RunDate=20070304&RaceID=526 alex Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lbm Posted February 14, 2008 Share Posted February 14, 2008 woops!!! appoliages to all it was a 15.2sec:blink: ive just been bact to check it and i was wrong soz;) ALEX HAMILTON 15.225 sec sec 0.434 sec 2.354 sec 90.0 mph mph Right lane http://www.crailraceway.co.uk/show_times.asp?CarNumber=126&RunDate=20070304&RaceID=526 alex well f*ck a duck! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECK Posted February 14, 2008 Share Posted February 14, 2008 well f*ck a duck! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevie72 Posted February 14, 2008 Share Posted February 14, 2008 well f*ck a duck! I tried that once, wasn't pleasant:tongue: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lbm Posted February 14, 2008 Share Posted February 14, 2008 I tried that once, wasn't pleasant:tongue: you gotta catch them first! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lust2luv Posted February 14, 2008 Share Posted February 14, 2008 This thread's still going?! Hilarious. When new an NA did 0-60 in 6.6 manual, 6.7 auto. With minor mods and the passage of time, they'll probably do it in around 7.0 I would have thought. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.