waderz06 Posted July 9, 2007 Share Posted July 9, 2007 see, this is why its better to start a new thread rather than search, it never ends on the same subject That is one way guaranteed to slow down your 0-60 time. Even if you own a TT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackie Posted July 9, 2007 Author Share Posted July 9, 2007 if it doesent invole effort she would do them (sit ups that is) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Havard Posted July 9, 2007 Share Posted July 9, 2007 As do I... I know my car has done more miles in the last year on the back of a trailer than being driven... (hope to change that shortly) Why are you going to have it towed instead.......... H. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grahamc Posted July 9, 2007 Share Posted July 9, 2007 Why are you going to have it towed instead.......... H. yeah, trailers are getting expensive to maintain... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Phillw454 Posted July 9, 2007 Share Posted July 9, 2007 This thread did make me smile:) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackie Posted July 10, 2007 Author Share Posted July 10, 2007 This thread did make me smile:) and thats what its about, i think Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chilly Posted July 10, 2007 Share Posted July 10, 2007 and thats what its about, i think Looking at the picture, looks like you've not pinned the tail on the donkeys arse!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snooze Posted July 10, 2007 Share Posted July 10, 2007 According to this: http://www.albeedigital.com/supercoupe/articles/0-60times.html (which usually seems pretty accurate) '94 N/A 0-60 time is 6.9s: 1983 Toyota Supra 8.9 16.8 1984 Toyota Supra 8.7 16.8 1986 Toyota Supra 7.0 15.4 1988 Toyota Supra 7.9 16.0 1989 Toyota Supra Turbo 6.6 15.2 1991 Toyota Supra Turbo 7.1 15.6 1993 Toyota Supra Turbo 4.6 13.1 (C&D Mar '93) 1994 Toyota Supra 6.9 15.2 1994 Toyota Supra Turbo 5.3 13.7 1995 Toyota Supra Turbo 5.1 13.5 1997 Toyota Supra Turbo 5.1 13.6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest gzaerojon Posted July 10, 2007 Share Posted July 10, 2007 i never knew they did 0-60 in 6.1 i didn't think they could do 60 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackie Posted July 10, 2007 Author Share Posted July 10, 2007 According to this: http://www.albeedigital.com/supercoupe/articles/0-60times.html (which usually seems pretty accurate) '94 N/A 0-60 time is 6.9s: 1983 Toyota Supra 8.9 16.8 1984 Toyota Supra 8.7 16.8 1986 Toyota Supra 7.0 15.4 1988 Toyota Supra 7.9 16.0 1989 Toyota Supra Turbo 6.6 15.2 1991 Toyota Supra Turbo 7.1 15.6 1993 Toyota Supra Turbo 4.6 13.1 (C&D Mar '93) 1994 Toyota Supra 6.9 15.2 1994 Toyota Supra Turbo 5.3 13.7 1995 Toyota Supra Turbo 5.1 13.5 1997 Toyota Supra Turbo 5.1 13.6 thank you very much snooze Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grahamc Posted July 10, 2007 Share Posted July 10, 2007 4 pages of banter, to get that... How does the NA catchup?? 1.6 secs for 0 - 60 and then 1.5 secs for 1/4 mile?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Posted July 10, 2007 Share Posted July 10, 2007 Jeeze, I can't believe Toyota made a car that slow... and all that trouble you get with them Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silvershark44 Posted July 10, 2007 Share Posted July 10, 2007 While an NA has reached 60 by the smooth linear power from its silky smooth engine, the TT boys are waiting for their enourmous turbos to spool up........ OR THEY HAVE BROKEN DOWN AGAIN Sorry couldn't resist Im pretty sure my turbos would have spooled by then Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackie Posted July 10, 2007 Author Share Posted July 10, 2007 Jeeze, I can't believe Toyota made a car that slow... and all that trouble you get with them i dunno, i have had mine 2 years and not a bit of trouble. had mine dynoed at 248bhp with a few mods done to it so its not that slow Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake Posted July 10, 2007 Share Posted July 10, 2007 i dunno, i have had mine 2 years and not a bit of trouble. had mine dynoed at 248bhp with a few mods done to it so its not that slow 248bhp? Blimey, that's not bad. Where was that dyno'd? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Posted July 10, 2007 Share Posted July 10, 2007 i dunno, i have had mine 2 years and not a bit of trouble. had mine dynoed at 248bhp with a few mods done to it so its not that slow Sorry mate, I was trying out dry humour... doesn't seem to be working for me I've got an N/A myself... was chucking a proverbial stone back at those pesky TT boys That's an impressive figure for an N/A... so decat, induction? what else? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Headroom Posted July 10, 2007 Share Posted July 10, 2007 Im pretty sure my turbos would have blown by then hehe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackie Posted July 10, 2007 Author Share Posted July 10, 2007 Sorry mate, I was trying out dry humour... doesn't seem to be working for me I've got an N/A myself... was chucking a proverbial stone back at those pesky TT boys That's an impressive figure for an N/A... so decat, induction? what else? was dynoed in bridewater something performance, its got iridium plugs, decat, induction kit (i think they work) lightened pullys and a full stainless exhaust and octain boost pills. all this cost me roughly £700 for an extra 20 odd bhp, dont know if it was worth it really Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
couv3z Posted July 10, 2007 Share Posted July 10, 2007 boost pills!!!! sounds like something you get in a club at 1am then a car mod Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackie Posted July 10, 2007 Author Share Posted July 10, 2007 boost pills!!!! sounds like something you get in a club at 1am then a car mod why wait till 1 am? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
couv3z Posted July 10, 2007 Share Posted July 10, 2007 because i'd be out or robinson fruit and Barlley Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clarkey Posted July 10, 2007 Share Posted July 10, 2007 Why don't you take it to a drag strip (pod for example) and find out what time you get ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackie Posted July 10, 2007 Author Share Posted July 10, 2007 because, how many times have you watched a non turbo supra going down a drag strip and thought " shit that looks slow" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clarkey Posted July 10, 2007 Share Posted July 10, 2007 because, how many times have you watched a non turbo supra going down a drag strip and thought " shit that looks slow" Well, if you want to know how fast you can do 0-60. The drag strip is the only place, I can think of, to safely and accurately do it. If you want more performance, have you considered getting a Nitrous kit fitted ? Easiest way to increase performance without going the Turbo conversion route. Maybe £600-£800 for the kit & maybe £50 for a 11 lb bottle re-fills. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackie Posted July 10, 2007 Author Share Posted July 10, 2007 i looked into wizard of noz on ebay for £300 but my insurance wouldent touch me. i am now not over bothered about how quick it goes, i was just interested in the 0-60, but i will be spending more on the looks of the car Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.