Jump to content
The mkiv Supra Owners Club

Sequential Big Twins.......


Suprash
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 93
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Gaz,

 

this 2 vs 1 argument has been around for years.

It is based on the incorrect assumption that the 'big' turbo will be twice as big as any of the 'small' ones.

The argument goes that inertia forces in centrifugal assemblies tend to increase by the square/cube of diameter, so the 'big' turbo that is twice as big will have to overcome resistance that is 4/8 times as much, hence the disproportionately larger lag.

 

In real life it ain't so because other manufacturing parameters get in the equation. Also a turbo that is twice as big will flow a lot more than the two 'half' turbos, so the comparison is flawed anyway;)

 

So, to answer why Nissan fitted the GTR with twins...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand what you mean by the assumption of one larger turbo being twice the size of the small ones.

 

So let me ask a simple one,

 

TT supra/stock turbos -

Single turbo supra - with a comparable compression output to the twin turbo on full tilt.

 

on the line - ready to set off - which is the fav? - the twin turbo must be off and gone first!?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dont forget toyotas turbo design principals have changed too....take for instance The twin-turbo 1JZ-GTE. it was rated at around 280 hp at 6200 rpm.

On the newer model 1jzgte (with VVT-i) Toyota dropped the twin setup and went single turbo. which produced well more than 300 hp andTorque was rated at 268 ft·lbf at 4800 rpm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So let me ask a simple one,

 

TT supra/stock turbos -

Single turbo supra - with a comparable compression output to the twin turbo on full tilt.

 

on the line - ready to set off - which is the fav? - the twin turbo must be off and gone first!?

 

Its already been shown that a well setup single can spool just as good if not better than a bpu stock tubbied motor.

 

Whats the argument here :search:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand what you mean by the assumption of one larger turbo being twice the size of the small ones.

 

So let me ask a simple one,

 

TT supra/stock turbos -

Single turbo supra - with a comparable compression output to the twin turbo on full tilt.

 

on the line - ready to set off - which is the fav? - the twin turbo must be off and gone first!?

 

Terry S's black car was making positive boost before 1500rpm, and full boost before 3000. Thats much quicker/more power than the sequentials can produce, not to mention that the single could reliably carry on up to 1.6 bar before coming out of its efficiency range.

 

Edited: Doh! Replied before reading Wez's reply :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its already been shown that a well setup single can spool just as good if not better than a bpu stock tubbied motor.

 

Whats the argument here :search:

 

there is no argument, im trying to learn something here :rolleyes:

 

I must had missed the post clarifying what you just stated :cool:

 

''Don't fall for the theory that two smaller turbos have less lag than a big one. This argument is flawed, and it usually comes from the same people who advocate that a big intercooler will increase lag''

 

thats what im trying to get my head round !!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Terry S's black car was making positive boost before 1500rpm, and full boost before 3000. Thats much quicker/more power than the sequentials can produce, not to mention that the single could reliably carry on up to 1.6 bar before coming out of its efficiency range.

...and I bet that it was from a later design generation than the CT12 units;) ...

 

As you know there are several factors involved when manipulating boost threshold/lag/off-boost response in general.

Also the design briefs can be different:

 

OEMs would tend to play it very safe with ignition advance for example, while a one-off can be mapped under the assumption of a minimum fuel quality.

 

Toyota did a good job out of squeezing the maximum out of the turbocharger technology they had at the time, and creating a very flat torque curve as well. Let's not forget that while this is good for driveability, it makes the car feel bland and uneventful. An enthusiast's car is unlikely to have a flat torque curve, isn't it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Toyota did a good job out of squeezing the maximum out of the turbocharger technology they had at the time, and creating a very flat torque curve as well.

 

How is the torque flat when the 2nd turbo comes online at 4000rpm, that is not giving it a smooth drive, unpredictable sounds closer.

 

:blink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. You might also be interested in our Guidelines, Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.