michael Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 Just one of those random thought things I guess but I was just thinking about this so thought I'd see what others thought too. At what point does a car go from being "a car" and become "a fast car"? Is it a 0-60 thing? Top speed? Handling? Lap times? Feel? Or maybe it's just relative to what you are used to? Moving on from this when does a car become "very fast"? I always think a 0-100mph time of under 10 seconds indicates a very fast car, 0-60mph doesn't seem to mean as much these days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Raven Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 0-60 tends to dictate whats fast for me. That and what top gear tells me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bignum Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 Good question, as ive often thought this aswell, some peoples idea of fast is very different to others.Like when you here people talking about a car saying its quick, sh$t of a shovel, rapid, blah, blah and they`re on about a saxo or civic or something which is obviously faster than they`re used too. I think the 0-100 in 10 seconds is more realistic to being fast or even better what time it can go around a track like on topgear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SupraHuman Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 I would say the 0-100mph time. and/or pulls from e.g 50mph and up. Top speed is not too important as you will hardly ever see the max potential for a very long period of time when driving on a public motorway etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dani_r Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 For me, fast would be the point when my face melts into the back of my head, or when I get whiplash from the acceleration! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ewen Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 Any car that makes my wife wet herself is 'fast'. As my wife gets older and car technology moves on, we find ourselves in a bizarre situation where 'fast' cars are actually getting slower. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colsoop Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 For most people the 0-60 is the be all and end all of a cars performance along with top speed. My personal view of a fast car is in gear acceleration times say 50 - 70 and 40 - 80. The sort of speeds most of us spend the majority of our time doing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnny g Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 I always think a 0-100mph time of under 10 seconds indicates a very fast car, 0-60mph doesn't seem to mean as much these days. I think with the power of today's cars, 0-60 in many cases is limited by the traction that the tyres are able to give. As you say, 0-100mph in 10 seconds is a fast car, it's an indication of good power and traction. For me, it's 30-70, 50-100mph - i.e. real world performance. It's all torque Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Havard Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 Anything that makes my stomach go all funny..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael Posted December 27, 2008 Author Share Posted December 27, 2008 A lot of the car mags seem to herald "the fastest X yet" and it's because it does 160mph instead of a limited 155mph... that annoys me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris2o2 Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 Its a hard one to call i guess. I think feel would be quite a large factor for me - a light and less powered car can and does on many occasion feel faster than a more powerful heavy maybe 4wd car. My old stripped out 106 xsi felt to me much faster than the prelude i owned after it even though the actual figures were quite the opposite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Havard Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 A lot of the car mags seem to herald "the fastest X yet" and it's because it does 160mph instead of a limited 155mph... that annoys me. Anything over a ton is probably a waste of time as you are not going to do that on public roads (unless you are braindead and don't particularly need your licence!!) I think any car that will rocket from 0 - 100 will be fast enough for anybody. I am personally looking for anything sub 5 sec 0 - 60..... H. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamieP Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 Anything that can do the 1/4 in 12 seconds or under is a fast car. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chiefgroover Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 I have come across people who think a 130BHP chipped Bora is a fast car. Some folks are easy pleased I guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miko_supra Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 I always look at power to weight ratios when seeing how cars compare and what i consider fast Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael Posted December 27, 2008 Author Share Posted December 27, 2008 I always look at power to weight ratios when seeing how cars compare and what i consider fast What do you consider a good power to weight ratio? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Havard Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 Anything that can do the 1/4 in 12 seconds or under is a fast car. *Edit - Anything that JamieP has owned in the past*..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndrewOW Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 Anything that can do the 1/4 in 12 seconds or under is a fast car. And then do a series of twisties at demonic speeds, would be a definition of a fast car too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miko_supra Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 What do you consider a good power to weight ratio? approaching 300bhp/ton or more i would say. Its always gonna go up with what you get used to. I remember when i was blown away when i got in an n/a supra for the first time and they are only about 160/ton...The fastest i've been in so far in terms of power to weight is a 4.2 cerbera and they are about 320 on paper Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SupraAyf Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 It's the 0-60 that counts for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DannyB Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 approaching 300bhp/ton or more i would say. Its always gonna go up with what you get used to. I remember when i was blown away when i got in an n/a supra for the first time and they are only about 160/ton...The fastest i've been in so far in terms of power to rate is a 4.2 cerbera and they are about 320 on paper 300/tonne is a good figure id say Im sat at 250 now, its fast, but my goal is 330/tonne It depends what other fast cars youve been in aswell i suppose 0-60 seems to be the pub figure to be honest, but if go with 30-120 times for a "fast" car. 0-100 is another good one as mentioned Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Headroom Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 I went from a NA Supra with 220bhp to a Volvo with 320bhp and I considered that fast Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaveK Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 Anything over a ton is probably a waste of time as you are not going to do that on public roads Don't be silly - you can do that in 40mph limits. I think a "fast" car is relative to what you're used to - and is what feels fast. If I don't feel I'm "waiting" for the car when I accelerate, then it's fast. Years ago, I sold my TT and the next car I bought was a 306 GTI-6. On the test drive, the salesman was in the back seat. We were accelerating flat out onto a dual carriageway, and he stated from the back that it was "Fast isn't it?". Er... no. For me, my NA is adequate and my 911 meets my criteria for fast - despite the fact that from a 0-60 point of view it would be way behind a TT. I never feel like I'm waiting for it when I accelerate, so it's fast enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest johnnie Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 Anything exceed 600HP is fast for me, if below 600 thats simple Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaveK Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 Anything exceed 600HP is fast for me, if below 600 thats simple Without any consideration of weight? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now