Wez Posted October 29, 2008 Author Share Posted October 29, 2008 It's just you seemed to have lost the legendary low down grunt yours used to have. Comparing your recent graph to your last one, it shows now you make around 320bhp at 4.5K, whereas before you were making around 440bhp!!! Your whole graph has shifted to the right Oh yeah never noticed that, hmmmm. I do have an exhaust blow from around the turbo and manifold which I havent looked into yet, maybe its something to do with that, I need to get it into the garage so I can strip the turbo side down and have a look. I cant remember if the 560hp was with the Veilside Ti or the Tanabe but I dont think that would have killed it by that much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jazzy Posted October 29, 2008 Share Posted October 29, 2008 Yeah I can't imagine the exhaust could cause that kind of difference. Does it feel any different, as I guess that's what really matters Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wez Posted October 29, 2008 Author Share Posted October 29, 2008 Yeah I can't imagine the exhaust could cause that kind of difference. Does it feel any different, as I guess that's what really matters Feels rapid as ever Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chiefgroover Posted October 29, 2008 Share Posted October 29, 2008 Speaks volume's for Mr Wilsons product, well done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imi Posted October 29, 2008 Share Posted October 29, 2008 Speaks volume's for Mr Wilsons product, well done. Thats refreshing to see as I am looking forward to seeing how mine performs with it on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terminator Posted October 29, 2008 Share Posted October 29, 2008 Congratulations Wez:d Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveR Posted October 29, 2008 Share Posted October 29, 2008 Oh yeah never noticed that, hmmmm. I do have an exhaust blow from around the turbo and manifold which I havent looked into yet, maybe its something to do with that, I need to get it into the garage so I can strip the turbo side down and have a look. I cant remember if the 560hp was with the Veilside Ti or the Tanabe but I dont think that would have killed it by that much. I don't think the throttle gets burried till higher up the rev range; lok at the AFR graph Ryan posted; it doesn't go to 11ish till higher up the rev range, indication no boost, perhaps through non-WOT. I suspect the same of my car's dyno printout too (i.e. non-WOT lower down the rev range), otherwise it's only got something silly like 100bhp at 3000rpm which is obviously wrong. Yes it's laggy low down, but not THAT laggy! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jazzy Posted October 29, 2008 Share Posted October 29, 2008 otherwise it's only got something silly like 100bhp at 3000rpm which is obviously wrong. Yes it's laggy low down, but not THAT laggy! Hmm, check Ryan's site, yours, mine and Jamie's only make around 120bhp at 3k, and Pig's makes smack on 100bhp at 3k. So seems right to me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveR Posted October 29, 2008 Share Posted October 29, 2008 Hmm, check Ryan's site, yours, mine and Jamie's only make around 120bhp at 3k, and Pig's makes smack on 100bhp at 3k. So seems right to me Doesn't seem right to me; that's my point. I don't think any of the cars on SRR get booted (WOT) from idle. I might be wrong, but I'm pretty sure I've got >120bhp at 3,000 rpm. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jazzy Posted October 29, 2008 Share Posted October 29, 2008 Having held my bonnet open at my last mapping sess, I can assure you Charlie goes WOT before it registers on the graph (having seen the throttle cable move ). You also get a nice view of the manifold as it glows Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveR Posted October 29, 2008 Share Posted October 29, 2008 Oh well, I've got a 120bhp Supra then. ...until the revs build Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wez Posted October 29, 2008 Author Share Posted October 29, 2008 The AFR would be different through the rev range and progressively get richer as rpm and boost increases, there is no need to run 11.5 at say 0.5bar at 4000rpm. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveR Posted October 30, 2008 Share Posted October 30, 2008 The AFR would be different through the rev range and progressively get richer as rpm and boost increases, there is no need to run 11.5 at say 0.5bar at 4000rpm. True, but you wouldn't expect to see >14ish at any boost level, yet you do. I'm no tuning expert though, so it could be me being wrong not the interpretation of the graph. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.