Ryan.G Posted August 27, 2007 Share Posted August 27, 2007 mmmm i thought the daf one was the slower spooling one i would agree bud mine feels pretty slow compared to homers but then b'have has a daf i think and his is on pars with homers on spool and mid range i would say. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wez Posted August 27, 2007 Author Share Posted August 27, 2007 mmmm i thought the daf one was the slower spooling one:search: Me too. The GT4088R from garrett is DBB and double the price. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tDR Posted August 27, 2007 Share Posted August 27, 2007 No, the original vid he had the smaller version - that's what I'm referring to. Reckon the stock valvetrain and rod bolts could handle 8.5k RPM for a 1/4 mile at a time? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homer Posted August 27, 2007 Share Posted August 27, 2007 i would agree bud mine feels pretty slow compared to homers but then b'have has a daf i think and his is on pars with homers on spool and mid range i would say. I didn't realise Charlie had a 4088 in his, thats one to try and blag a ride in then Is that in his 6spd or the auto? Either way, if it's on par with the T67 it's obviously not a viable option to gain more lower down torque. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan.G Posted August 27, 2007 Share Posted August 27, 2007 6sp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wez Posted August 27, 2007 Author Share Posted August 27, 2007 Darryl I found this graph which shows the spool on the dyno. #1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake Posted August 27, 2007 Share Posted August 27, 2007 I've had a PHR Stage one and currently have a GT4088. In my opinion the 4088 is much better suited to the Supra, although I do wish I'd gone for a slightly smaller turbine housing. The .96 back housing is just a little too late spooling for my tastes. I'm convinced a .81 A/R 4088 would be the perfect compromise between the weedy t60/t61/gt35 turbos and the t67 turbos. Ryan's been in my (gt4088) car and several other gt4088 and T67s. I'd be interested to know his thoughts on how they compare. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wez Posted August 27, 2007 Author Share Posted August 27, 2007 Its interesting to hear all these opinions on various turbos. This along with the SRR dyno day thread there are dyno plots which can be overlayed to show true comparisons. I think that dyno day has proved to be a real asset Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matt k Posted August 27, 2007 Share Posted August 27, 2007 What a great way to spent an afternoon - tw*ting around in single turbo supra's Again I was very impressed with your car, the power comes in so soon and punchy, a very different driving experience to mine. Still not sure whether I prefer the T61 or T67 for the way it delivers power, perhaps something in between the two Yeah MattC has a GT35R and i've got a t04R and they are enjoyable in different ways, the 35R is almost instant but the T04 is real fun when it hits full boost. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan.G Posted August 28, 2007 Share Posted August 28, 2007 Ryan's been in my (gt4088) car and several other gt4088 and T67s. I'd be interested to know his thoughts on how they compare. I will look at the datalogs from all the different cars tomorrow as got the morning off and will try and do a little write up on what i think of the different turbos i have mapped. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b_have Posted August 28, 2007 Share Posted August 28, 2007 i would agree bud mine feels pretty slow compared to homers but then b'have has a daf i think and his is on pars with homers on spool and mid range i would say. Mine is a Garrett Gt4088 with a Precision .81 housing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vvteye Posted August 28, 2007 Share Posted August 28, 2007 Only a couple of weeks to go and I'll be experiencing this single fun! I'm having a garrett 4088R but will be on stock cams for a while. Don't go asking me any other technical quesitons at this stage though as I'm clueless. Hopefully the engine will last longer on this rebuild than the last time though. CAn't waiit in for another 1000 miles knowing that the power is there but I must restrain myself! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wez Posted August 28, 2007 Author Share Posted August 28, 2007 Ohhh a VVTI single using a MAP2, I would be very interested in your dyno plot when its done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vvteye Posted August 28, 2007 Share Posted August 28, 2007 Ohhh a VVTI single using a MAP2, I would be very interested in your dyno plot when its done. Is that a good expectation or a bad one? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wez Posted August 28, 2007 Author Share Posted August 28, 2007 Good The MAP2 is piggy back isnt it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tDR Posted August 28, 2007 Share Posted August 28, 2007 Good The MAP2 is piggy back isnt it? Yes, exactly what I'm running. I think it'd do a good job of running a single conversion as there's decent resolution. Cheers, Brian. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vvteye Posted August 28, 2007 Share Posted August 28, 2007 Good The MAP2 is piggy back isnt it? Yeah, on top of Jakes old vvti ecu. I'm hoping for some fun after all the heartache should be ready for the dry spell after the summer we've had! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.