Dragonlady Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 A Charlotte, NC lawyer purchased a box of very rare and expensive cigars, then insured them against fire, among other things. Within a month, having smoked his entire stockpile of these great cigars and without yet having made even his first premium payment on the policy, the lawyer filed claim against the insurance company. In his claim, the lawyer stated the cigars were lost 'in a series of small fires.' The insurance company refused to pay, citing the obvious reason that the man had consumed the cigars in the normal fashion. The lawyer sued.. And WON! (Stay with me.) In delivering the ruling, the judge agreed with the insurance company that the claim was frivolous. The judge stated nevertheless, that the lawyer held a policy >from the company in which it had warranted that the cigars were insurable and also guaranteed that it would insure them against fire, without defining what is considered to be unacceptable fire' and was obligated to pay the claim. Rather than endure lengthy and costly appeal process, the insurance company accepted the ruling and paid $15,000 to the lawyer for his loss of the rare cigars lost in the 'fires'. NOW FOR THE BEST PART... After the lawyer cashed the check, the insurance company had him arrested on 24 counts of ARSON!!! With his own insurance claim and testimony from the previous case being used against him, the lawyer was convicted of intentionally burning his insured property and was sentenced to 24 months in jail and a $24,000 fine. This is a true story and was the First Place winner in the recent Criminal Lawyers Award Contest. ONLY IN AMERICA! NO WONDER THIRD WORLD COUNTRIES THINK WE'RE NUTS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndrewOW Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 NO WONDER THIRD WORLD COUNTRIES THINK WE'RE NUTS. No wonder we ALL think they're nuts! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrHanky Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 LOL, you can never be sure about whether these things happened or not. But it is funny none the less Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaz Walker Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 Funny, but ultimately not true http://www.snopes.com/crime/clever/cigarson.asp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 Heard that one 2 or 3 years back Still clever, mind you. :edit: Doh, too slow. Wow, 11 year old rumour though! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neil tt Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 That is so good, shame its not real:d Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoff Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 Good story, true or not:) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
markjodrell Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 Thats a brill tale, pity it was too good to be true though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlotte Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 Good story, true or not:) Literally a good fictional story? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Havard Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 I'm off to insure my bath against flooding......LOL!! H. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marbleapple Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 Its a bit like the bloke in the UK who changes his name to Inlan Renenu to try cash cheques from the Inland Revenue - As for the lawyer, not only would have have had the 24k fine, but he would likely have been banned from working as a lawyer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 Its a bit like the bloke in the UK who changes his name to Inlan Renenu to try cash cheques from the Inland Revenue - As for the lawyer, not only would have have had the 24k fine, but he would likely have been banned from working as a lawyer Wasn't there a tax man in the US that changed his name to Ian Robert Steven, or something like that? Then he just altered the cheques to read I R Stevens. Probably another hoax though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chiefgroover Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 Old story, gets changed about a little but very very funny never the less! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 I'm off to insure my bath against flooding......LOL!! H. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now