Jump to content
The mkiv Supra Owners Club

What do you have to do ?


Ian R

Recommended Posts

According to www.thisismoney.co.uk it seems like it's because your chief exec has been saying things are going to be tough for Tesco in the next 6 months.

Why Tesco is talking down prospects

When things are going as well as they are for Tesco, the big problem is to try not to make it look too easy.

 

That's why chief executive Sir Terry Leahy is doing his level best to talk down prospects for the second half and harping on about the possible impact on the business of high oil prices and above-inflation increases in business rates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At NU our share price rockets when we offshore UK jobs to India. Yay go us. We also report cracking results to shareholders, get on the news about how great we've done this year, bully for us - but the moment it gets to bonuses and pay reviews, suddenly the story internally changes to "it's all grim and going downhill". Hmmm.

 

-Ian

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At NU our share price rockets when we offshore UK jobs to India. Yay go us. We also report cracking results to shareholders, get on the news about how great we've done this year, bully for us - but the moment it gets to bonuses and pay reviews, suddenly the story internally changes to "it's all grim and going downhill". Hmmm.

 

-Ian

 

Thats so true, i've only worked for 3 companys, but all 3 were the same! never got any money to pay the staff, but it's always there for shareholders. :stickpoke

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats so true, i've only worked for 3 companys, but all 3 were the same! never got any money to pay the staff, but it's always there for shareholders. :stickpoke

Without wishing to cause a furore, isnt that how it should be? Shareholders invest in a company to see results that wil produce dividends and or growth on their investment. These investments can go down as well as up - thats the gamble. Take me for example. I have invested about 30k of my own money in the company via shares. When we come to the end of the year, dont you think it is fair that people like me get our bonus before the staff? Remember that if the company goes tits up, I will lose that 30k and , like the others, my job and income too.

 

Now, the old argument of we could not have done the results without the staff falls down when you consider that there would be no company and no staff had we not put our money in right at the begining.

 

I realise that this is different to what Ian C is saying but would be interested in everyones thouights just the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Call me sad but I agree with you CJ now I get paid a best wage possible for the job I do and thats the benefit of working for NO.1. I get good share payouts every year through profit sharing and benefit greatly through save as you earn shares.

The thing is Tesco invest in their staff with a core practice of look after our staff so they can look after are customers.

What gets my goat is that we deliver fantastic results which in turn should reflect in the share price. As a shareholder and what I want is the share price to shoot up. It amazes me that we can have a boom with dot com fly by nights yet the UK's most succesfull retailer the shares drop on the back of fantastic results through shear hard work and commitment. But still suppose I cant moan when I hold shares five years ago I bought at £1.20 :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...don't talk to me about fucking shareholders. As you may know I was recently made redundant from B&Q head office. The main reason for this seems to be that profits are down from an expected 530 million pounds to 'only' 500 million. So, because we 'only' made half a billion profit the shareholders are demanding something is done to cut costs. The next thing hundreds of us get laid off.

The thing is, a couple of years ago 500 million profit would have been fantastic but once you have pulled out a great set of results that then becomes the benchmark for failure. Unless your next results increase on the last ones PLUS 10% you're apparently doing shit. How does that work then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...don't talk to me about fucking shareholders. As you may know I was recently made redundant from B&Q head office. The main reason for this seems to be that profits are down from an expected 530 million pounds to 'only' 500 million. So, because we 'only' made half a billion profit the shareholders are demanding something is done to cut costs. The next thing hundreds of us get laid off.

The thing is, a couple of years ago 500 million profit would have been fantastic but once you have pulled out a great set of results that then becomes the benchmark for failure. Unless your next results increase on the last ones PLUS 10% you're apparently doing shit. How does that work then?

As I have never run a company with that sort of t/o and profit, I cannot comment but I can comment on the 10% increase over last year.

 

Invariably, costs rise year on year. These include wages, rents (multi site operations have rent reviews at different times so you may have some increase whilst others stay as is), utilities, etc etc. These added costs go straight to the bottom line. When companies talk of increases year on year, they usually look at a % increase in sales so that the extra profits made cover the extra costs and give a bit more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. You might also be interested in our Guidelines, Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.