Si_s Supe Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 If I removed the rear quarter running lights from my facelift and fitted non facelift rear spats, would they be tall enough to cover the holes from the running lights? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Si_s Supe Posted June 8, 2011 Author Share Posted June 8, 2011 I've been looking at a few photos of facelifts with spats on today, and I don't think my theory of pre facelift spats covering the running light holes will work! Anyone got any advice that could confirm? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ripped_fear Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 no they wouldn't be iirc I think the top half of the hole would be on show. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Si_s Supe Posted June 9, 2011 Author Share Posted June 9, 2011 Hmmm. This was my thought. It's a shame as I wouldn't mind loosing the running lights, but as all the paint on the car is original, I don't want to go down the route of filling and painting! So, I will happily live with them!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 Why not just get facelift spats? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Si_s Supe Posted June 9, 2011 Author Share Posted June 9, 2011 Why not just get facelift spats? That's what I shall. The original thought of having pre facelift ones was to delete the red running lights. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Si_s Supe Posted June 9, 2011 Author Share Posted June 9, 2011 Anyone got any facelift spats going?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now