damadom Posted March 31, 2011 Share Posted March 31, 2011 Was bored today so i thoguth id have a laugh with some quotes, so i did a quote on a na turbo and tt and what i found was slightly wierd. For an n/a it came out at 1287 a year for the turbo it was 1689 and for the tt it was less then the turbo at 1472. So i just thought shall i get rid of my n/a and get a tt as the insurence isnt that much more. by the way im 21 with 1 years no claim and put it as fully comp with 500 excess. Matt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaz6002 Posted March 31, 2011 Share Posted March 31, 2011 If those quotes were online then I think you'll be disappointed unless you can afford to get a stock UK TT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heckler Posted March 31, 2011 Share Posted March 31, 2011 Was bored today so i thoguth id have a laugh with some quotes, so i did a quote on a na turbo and tt and what i found was slightly wierd. For an n/a it came out at 1287 a year for the turbo it was 1689 and for the tt it was less then the turbo at 1472. So i just thought shall i get rid of my n/a and get a tt as the insurence isnt that much more. by the way im 21 with 1 years no claim and put it as fully comp with 500 excess. Matt It's because the NA was import only, whereas the TT wasn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Attero Posted March 31, 2011 Share Posted March 31, 2011 Why do you find this so wierd? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaz6002 Posted March 31, 2011 Share Posted March 31, 2011 Can I just add: insurance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
damadom Posted March 31, 2011 Author Share Posted March 31, 2011 Why do you find this so wierd? Being as the na is the slowest and less tunable i thought the insurance would be more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
damadom Posted March 31, 2011 Author Share Posted March 31, 2011 Plus i never knew that n/a's where only imports. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Attero Posted March 31, 2011 Share Posted March 31, 2011 Being as the na is the slowest and less tunable i thought the insurance would be more. You got that the other way around. A turbocharged RWD is much more likely to crash and those Supras that do crash are mostly turbos. They always hold a much higher value, which the insurance companies have to (or should) pay out for. N/As aren't particuarly dangerous cars to drive (providing the driver isn't a total buffoon). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
damadom Posted March 31, 2011 Author Share Posted March 31, 2011 oops i did didnt i hopefully the it will pass its retest and ill be driving it by sunday then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now