Guest Nicholas Posted March 18, 2008 Share Posted March 18, 2008 why not mix it up 264/272 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Nicholas Posted March 18, 2008 Share Posted March 18, 2008 The difference between the T51 nonDBB and T51DBB is like night and Day. Soon i will add a link to a dyno plot application that is being finished as we speak but until then compare Ashbhp T51 plot to say a gt4088 or T67 Having seen comparitive dyno graphs it certainly looks like the DB makes a big difference to spool up time. Are you both sure? I didn't think there was much difference between the bb and non bb be interested to know if there is a massive difference as suggested above before I buy my kit! Anyone got the specs of both to compare? I couldn't find them on the hksusa site Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan.G Posted March 18, 2008 Share Posted March 18, 2008 All on Same dyno Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan.G Posted March 18, 2008 Share Posted March 18, 2008 The t51 272in, 272ex , 1.3bar, stock engine curve had to stop at 6000rpm as after that it started wheel spining on the dyno due to the strapping not being ideal with a custom splitter that was fitted. Ryan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Nicholas Posted March 18, 2008 Share Posted March 18, 2008 http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a346/Fletchy/T51dbbvsnondbb.jpg All on Same dyno That's all good but surely with ash's engine being a 3.1 this reduces the spool time on the t51 dbb even more. Would be interesting to know the exact difference. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.