paul_y3k Posted July 25, 2005 Share Posted July 25, 2005 Are legal arnt they ? Sparked a debate at work about the legality of them, guy here thinks they are not legal as taking a pic of the person is invasion of privacy ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fifty Posted July 25, 2005 Share Posted July 25, 2005 That wont stop Gordon HEWANTS YOUR MONEY LOL 50 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magicmatty Posted July 25, 2005 Share Posted July 25, 2005 They are banned in Scotland where people obviously give a Monkeys about privacy...Its to do with removing your basic right to silence. If your photo'd, mug on, there's no: "I dont know who was driving" or silence 'cause your done already.... Not right. Us bikers love 'em though cause theres no catching us....No plate, No mug shot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Class One Posted July 25, 2005 Share Posted July 25, 2005 Nope, Cos they're passive cameras and only work when activated by a vehicle breaking the speed limit. Therefore there will be a legitimate limitation ie A) Prescribed by law; B) Intended to achieve a legitimate objective, and C) Proportionate to the end that is to be achieved. So under Article 7 of the European Convention of Human Rights A right to a private life.People are entitled to respect for a A) Private Life; B) Family Life; C) Home and, D) Correspondence. However these can be interfered with if the three tests can be successfully applied: There is a legal authority There is a legitimate objective There is a need for the interference Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now