Jump to content
The mkiv Supra Owners Club

Going single: pros and cons


JohnA

Recommended Posts

John there are huge amounts of BS talked in the Supra community, here and abroad. It gets worse the further up the modifying tree you go.It is just a matter of sifting and making informed decisions.

I couldn't agree more mate.

You can see from my website that I don't suffer fools gladly, neither can advertisers piss all over me and tell me it's raining.

 

Hence my BPU- designation, apart from the stainless exhaust I can't keep any of this 'bpu' crap, it's all useless.

What little really works people aren't keen on, because it's no 'bling' and is not glamourous. :tongue:

 

(Pass on the dump valve for n/a engines mate. Diesels, too. I kid you not!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi all i am a forum virgin so be nice!!

i ave a 95 RZS TT 6 speed with lots of bits allready pulling 1.1 bar and rolling roaded at 351bhp.since then i have fitted a trust airinx induction kit and removed the rear baffle from the blitz nur spec system.she then pulled 1.3 bar!! i then found in my de cat pipe a 50mm to 45mm restricting washer. i removed it to find she pulled 1.4 bar. the mods are blue samco hose kit.uprated walbro fuel pump.uprated clutch. stainless brake hoses.blitz offside mounted intercooler .18x10 lexus rims and a few other bits and bobs. i have just purchased a single turbo conversion kit from importuning! does anyone know if i am stupid!! have any of you had experience of this unit. it seems very cheap but looks fantastic. all aircraft grade 6 branch manifold massive front mounted intercooler & t4 turbo! will i be around the 500bhp mark? what else will i have to upgrade? ps. sometimes @ around 5000 rpm under hard throttle in 4th 5th or 6th gear she cuts back and jerks violently!! is she running out of fuel or overboosting? help before she goes bang.........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol ! :D

Jake - I know you weren't being sarcy - but I did find that funny!

:p I see what you mean :p

 

You're right though, I wasn't being sarcky and the guy IS gonna kill his motor if he's running 1.4 bar on stock turbos and injectors

Link to comment
Share on other sites

very diplomatic :p

 

 

I know, been through them, but as more 'hard' evidence comes to light and more people experience first hand, the more accurately this can be weighed...

 

Ill take you out in a single equiped car tommorrow John , its the starter pack as i like to call it , real world stuff , mine is at the shop but having to do some fab work to get the new 'larger' turbo to sit where i want it to so its not running at present , you are welcome to a ride in that when it is just bring spare pants !!! :looney: its even made certain people :cry: !! hasnt it Paul !!! :limp:

 

Dude :devil:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i have just done this, and done it the hard way meaning i bought all the bits seperate to save money and i enjoy the challenge, but it is still feckin expensive i have a tubular manifold and a T61, i already had a FMIC, AFC, ITC, FSE, 550's, brakes etc so it was the logical step to go single, if it is your long term aim to go single build up the parts over a year or so, i started with a pace intercooler and made the end tanks myself (cost £350 in total) and went from there, i hate to say it and this may upset some of the traders on here but if you go this route get all your stuff from the USA, i would say i have spent £2000 doing this and thats not counting all the supporting mods

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've seen a few routes through the States to source these as 'kits'

OK, you'll also need mapping etc afterwards, but most of the matching/fabricating work has already been done for you. (Thank God for the car being available in the States as well.)

 

However the purpose of this thread is to evaluate the concept of going single, not the cost of doing so.

 

I like 'mods' that complement the character of a car, not ones that look or sound 'kewl' but try to make it something that it isn't (and eventually nature wins, always)

 

The Supra's claim to fame (so to speak) is the sequential system (only used in the last RX7 I think) which tries to make a 3.0 lt engine behave like a 5.0. Just look at the stock torque curve.

 

Now trying to make it behave like a big two-stroke will inevitably change the character, such a big heavy beast needs power at low revs or else it crawls like a snake until it picks up at silly revs (and by that time you've lost half of the clutch). That's an extreme example of course, I'm sure most 'single' designs try to find some middle ground.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you ever taken a ride in a single conversion yet ?

nope

I don't think you will find that it "crawls" at all. ;)

 

There is a touch of hesitation, then the instant grin from ear to ear.

So you're saying that the low-down pull and midrange are not affected? Or they are affected, but not really missed, considering the high-rev rush?

And is that a 'small' single conversion you're talking about then?

 

To see where I'm coming from, I've had people praise the 'true twin' conversion, claiming that it makes more power, better feeling/handling overall, blah blah (which is utter bollox of course, just goes to show how much a different power delivery can deceive the 'seat of pants' dyno)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

nope

 

So you're saying that the low-down pull and midrange are not affected? Or they are affected, but not really missed, considering the high-rev rush?

And is that a 'small' single conversion you're talking about then?

 

To see where I'm coming from, I've had people praise the 'true twin' conversion, claiming that it makes more power, better feeling/handling overall, blah blah (which is utter bollox of course, just goes to show how much a different power delivery can deceive the 'seat of pants' dyno)

 

Really the car to have a go in is Terry Saunders , it makes power at such low revs we were a bit worried about the con rods !!!Of course the trade off is that it wont make huge numbers further up but as a road car its devastating

 

Dude :devil:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

nope

 

So you're saying that the low-down pull and midrange are not affected? Or they are affected, but not really missed, considering the high-rev rush?

And is that a 'small' single conversion you're talking about then?

 

To see where I'm coming from, I've had people praise the 'true twin' conversion, claiming that it makes more power, better feeling/handling overall, blah blah (which is utter bollox of course, just goes to show how much a different power delivery can deceive the 'seat of pants' dyno)

 

 

Well on the stock ceramics they came on at 2500rpm, now I am running an HKS GT3040 which comes on at 3800rpm, so there is some hesitation compared to before but you do get used to it and change your driving style to suit. I would not mind having a small shot of nitrous on a progressive controller to help with the initial spool up. All in all though it is still streetable as it is now and I am happy with the upgrade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Terrys has so much Torque that when it leaves the line the chassis twists !! :looney:

wrong forum, Pizza boy :tongue:

 

Just been through this thread from last year

Enjoyable, :respekt: , nice to see people sharing non-trivial info.

 

I wonder if that silly camcover filter is still there --- bad for the braincells, bad for turbo longevity too.

Otherwise (unsheilded air filter apart) looks like a neat little project. :respekt:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. You might also be interested in our Guidelines, Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.