Jump to content
The mkiv Supra Owners Club

My UK TT6 in Modern Classics Magazine - June 2017 edition


blythmrk
 Share

Recommended Posts

The journalist loved the supra he's a proper petrol head!

I especially like his description of the v160 boxes feel

 

You could tell he had a real soft spot for the Supra! I think it was a forgone conclusion after the first paragraph where his vote was going.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, but both are products of their time. Both are dated now.

 

I do think the MKiv Supra has aged very well I owed a mk1 Escort when it was 24 years old and it felt ancient (that was 20 years ago)

I have always thought the 300zx's are more near a mkiii Supra especially in size.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With that greatest of respect that statement is absolute bollocks.

Well the reason they both exist is because that's what people were buying at the time. Neither Toyota or Nissan have any cars that fit the class of the Supra/300ZX now, because people would rather buy these god forsaken crossover abortions of automobile design.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Rsb
The Z32 300ZX is one of the best looking cars ever made. It looks no more dated than the Supra.

 

I was only stating my opinion - thought I would be safe on the Supra forum :-)

 

I have heard that the MKIV Supra was being developed around 1990 when the 300ZX came out and Toyota redesigned it due to the ZX so it likely influenced the Supra in many ways. I thought the Nissan was a great looking car and it still appeals but the Supra in my eyes was ahead of its time design wise and now looks almost modern. Also, the engine with the turbo set up with minimal lag is something we take for granted now. In some ways the interior also feels more up market than the Nissan perhaps influenced by Lexus and in the UK the Supra seemed more modern with dual airbags etc. I do like the removable roof on the Nissan.

 

They are both excellent cars, it is good to see they are even more relevant today as a reminder of a lost era of motoring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I bought my Supra in 1999 I also considered the 300ZX as an equivalent. That's how it was back then. Both cars in production but the 300ZX was more of a wide bodied cruiser and nearing the end of its production run. The 300ZX was more styled to that early 80's clear lines Filofax era which made it appealing that has also dated it (akin in many ways to the Supra MkIII body style) relative to the curvaceous MkIV Supra body which still, today, looks almost current apart from a lack of running LEDs.

 

When I think back 20 years ago, it wasn't a clear choice that to most it appears to be today. However, I am certain if I had bought a 300ZX in 1999, I wouldn't still own it today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

. It looks no more dated than the Supra.

 

I really like the z32, but it hasn't aged anywhere near as well as the supra. If you look at the two designs, the supra has far more in common with most modern GT's, having curved and flared wings. The z32 has large Windows and is very slab sided in comparison, which makes it look dated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. You might also be interested in our Guidelines, Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.