Jump to content
The mkiv Supra Owners Club

anti roll bars & bushes


crispy
 Share

Recommended Posts

Nic...how stiff are these vs the Titan ARBs!?

 

I've no experience of the US made Titan ARB's, but this is how they compare to the stock ARB's.

 

Cusco ARB

Front 153% stiffer than stock ARB.

Rear is adjustable, either 240% or 297% stiffer compared to stock ARB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cusco ARB

Front 153% stiffer than stock ARB.

Rear is adjustable, either 240% or 297% stiffer compared to stock ARB.

 

Checked on google mate...numbers you stated seem to be ratio with standard

Meaning the

fronts are 53% stiffer than stock and

rears are 140-197% stiffer than stock.

 

That sounds alot on the rear!?

 

Stats as stated by you on here in 2005 direct from the Cusco website:

 

Front(32mm Hollow bar)

The kit includes 2 bushings, and need apprx.1 hour for installation.

Stiffness: 153% against Factory 30mm hollow bar.

 

Rear(22mm Solid bar)

The kit includes 2 bushings, and need apprx.1 hour for installation.

Stiffness: 2way Adjustable, 240%/297% against Factory 19.2mm hollow bar.

 

So don't think I am arguing...just surprised at the numbers!?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The TRD's are stiff enough so god knows how stiff these others

must be if your figures above are correct, seems very high to me and

my car with the TRD's on it has hardly any roll

 

According to Whifbitz the TRD's are 27% stiffer than stock.

 

Titan figures from Whifbitz site

 

Front Sway Bar (2 way adjustable)

 

Light Setting 8% stiffer then TRD 498.9 lbs/in

 

Heavy Setting 27% stiffer than TRD 584 lbs/in

 

Rear Sway Bar (3 way adjustable)

 

Light 18% softer then TRD 367 lbs/in

 

Medium 6% Stiffer than TRD 458 lbs/in

 

Heavy 35% Stiffer than TRD 588 lbs/in

Edited by Dnk (see edit history)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

ok and any one uprated there cars front & rear bushes?

 

The ball joints are an integral part of the arms and cannot easily be replaced separately, you'll get better results replacing with brand new OEM arms. Do a search in the Tech section and you'll find a lot of threads on the subject.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Checked on google mate...numbers you stated seem to be ratio with standard

 

It's a comparison of the stock ARB stiffness expressed as a
percentage
.

 

ie. if the stock front ARB is 392 lbs/in, the Cusco front ARB is 392 x 153% = 600 lbs/in

 

Details taken from the Cusco website
HERE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a comparison of the stock ARB stiffness expressed as a
percentage
.

 

ie. if the stock front ARB is 392 lbs/in, the Cusco front ARB is 392 x 153% = 600 lbs/in

 

Details taken from the Cusco website
HERE

 

I understand that Nic. Thanks for the link.:)

 

Out of interest how much are the Cusco ARBs delivered to the UK!?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. You might also be interested in our Guidelines, Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.