Jump to content
The mkiv Supra Owners Club

Which manifold???


Hassan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

 

Im planning to go single turbo soon.Ive bought a PHR stage 1 turbo but i dont know which manifold to go for either Cast short-runner or s/s tubular manifold?? Im only planning to go max 550bhp. and i want super fast spool. Which manifold do you think will be best for me?? or what are the pros and cons of each manifold??

 

Thankx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going for cast.

 

Benefits are:

 

Cost

Spool

More torque

 

Drawbacks are:

 

Slightly less BHP

Restrictive after silly HP

Not as shiney and nice

 

Did I see you coming out of strathclyde park last week? Onto the raith roundabout?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just go with what I'm told :D

 

Cast is much much shorter though, that would justify the faster spool. That would lead to more torque down the rev range IMO.

 

I don't know if by the "more torque" quotes they mean peak or low revs. Going by when most people hit max torque they might be one and the same though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hear people say it but any proof behind that statment?

 

Wez's engine is a good example of the spool gains when using a cast manifold, especially when it was running small cams. The "more torque" quote is a little misleading, the early spool is what gives the higher low/mid range torque when compared to tubular, not the manifold itself as such. I've written a fair bit about manifold choice but haven't got time to finish the article yet :(

 

To the OP - are you using an auto or manual gearbox? Are you likely to want more than 550bhp at any point in the future?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're going to be limited to ~550bhp at the flywheel unless you change the box.

 

BTW, here's a copy of of what I'd had noted for the manifold part of the single turbo FAQ. It's completely unfinished but should cover some of the basics.

 

Choosing the manifold type

 

This is often overlooked. There are two options available – cast and tubular. The tubular option is by far the most commonly used due to their availability; however that is not to say it is always the best choice. It’s important to note that the position of the turbo in the engine bay is different between the two types which can cause some off-the-shelf produce to not fit correctly, see below.

 

Cast

 

The manifold itself is very similar in look to the stock TT one, with just some small changes to the flange to allow an external wastegate and single turbo fitment. Both have their advantages and disadvantages:

 

Advantages:

- Cast is considered the most reliable and strongest compared to tubular

- Much cheaper to purchase

 

Disadvantages:

- It is limited in terms of the power it can produce due to flow limitations of it’s design, they generally have a 550-600bhp power limit.

- Availability of bolt-on manifolds is scarce, many require modification to be workable.

- Different position of the turbo means that a specialised downpipe, screamer pipe and intake is required

- They don’t sound all that great compared to tubular

 

Tubular

 

This manifold design is by far the commonly used due to them being the choice for most kit suppliers.

 

Advantages:

- Higher flow tubular design means that they are not limited to the 550-600bhp range of a cast manifold. The commonly used T4 manifolds from the likes of BL, HKS, Greddy, etc are proven to work up to 900bhp.

- Huge availability and choice

- Sound nicer than a cast manifold

- Downpipes, intakes, etc are available off the shelf to fit this type of turbo position

Disadvantages

- More expensive to purchase, though this can be offset due to single turbo package price discounts

- More prone to cracking than cast

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wez's engine is a good example of the spool gains when using a cast manifold, especially when it was running small cams. The "more torque" quote is a little misleading, the early spool is what gives the higher low/mid range torque when compared to tubular, not the manifold itself. I've written a fair bit about manifold choice but haven't got time to finish the article yet :(

 

To the OP - are you using an auto or manual gearbox? Are you likely to want more than 550bhp at any point in the future?

 

Wez is on a lot smaller turbo than me and it only just spools a tad faster, 50rpm id guess, i think Dandan is on cast, his spools pretty well but if i remember right he is on stock cams.

 

Im not convinced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wez is on a lot smaller turbo than me and it only just spools a tad faster, 50rpm id guess, i think Dandan is on cast, his spools pretty well but if i remember right he is on stock cams.

 

Im not convinced.

 

I know where you're coming from but I'm referring to Wez's old (more basic) setup.

 

Your engine is so far modified it makes it difficult to become a base comparision for a generic setup IYSWIM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wez is on a lot smaller turbo than me and it only just spools a tad faster, 50rpm id guess, i think Dandan is on cast, his spools pretty well but if i remember right he is on stock cams.

 

Im not convinced.

 

Is that not comparing apples with oranges though J? Did you not say that your tubby is a bit of a hybrid given how fast it spools?

 

You would need to take your tubular off and put on a cast to see the comparison.

 

 

Darryl, are the folks selling the cast manifolds quoting 900hp just plain lying or are they a different design from previous cast manifolds?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know where you're coming from but I'm referring to Wez's old (more basic) setup.

 

Your engine is so far modified it makes it difficult to become a base comparision for a generic setup IYSWIM.

 

Wez old setup on stock cams? Ryan said that graph was not right, done in the wrong shoot out or something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OBX manfifolds look pretty good, they are a budget one, but are a different world to the likes of XS power. Seen one close up and they appear to be well designed and welded. It did still need a machine on the faces though.

 

There's not much around the forums how durable they are though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. You might also be interested in our Guidelines, Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.