Ark Posted June 24, 2009 Share Posted June 24, 2009 http://www.pistonheads.com/news/default.asp?storyId=20159 It said it on the Internet, so it must be true... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveR Posted June 24, 2009 Share Posted June 24, 2009 I hate that SH-IT (it's something like that ) car. Why can't they crack on with the LF-A, the real Supra-like car an the worthy successor to the name? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamieP Posted June 24, 2009 Share Posted June 24, 2009 If they do build one and keep the price inline with the R35GTR i would seriously consider buying one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ark Posted June 24, 2009 Author Share Posted June 24, 2009 They're talking about 30 grand. Even I could afford that... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supra_aero Posted June 24, 2009 Share Posted June 24, 2009 Looks terrible Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamieP Posted June 24, 2009 Share Posted June 24, 2009 They're talking about 30 grand. Even I could afford that... If it is 30k id be supprised if it will be a match for the GTR's performance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nevins Posted June 24, 2009 Share Posted June 24, 2009 it looks crap they've destroyed the image of the supra, being in this present time it'll probably end up running on a load of AAA batteries and go no faster than a walking pace Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bradleyh_15 Posted June 24, 2009 Share Posted June 24, 2009 as long as its not as heavy as it looks with only 400bhp! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supra_aero Posted June 24, 2009 Share Posted June 24, 2009 I will hold out for the new rx7 thanks. The only jap (technically american) manufacturer who still makes decent looking sports cars. That said 350z isn't that bad.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rays the roof Posted June 24, 2009 Share Posted June 24, 2009 Wonder if you can get factory fitted extras such as undercar neons, nos and a F50 bonnet scoop fitted! Chavtastic Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pistonbroke Posted June 24, 2009 Share Posted June 24, 2009 it looks crap they've destroyed the image of the supra, being in this present time it'll probably end up running on a load of AAA batteries and go no faster than a walking pace I imagine people said the same during the transition from mk3 to mk4. Look at them side by side, if you didn't know what you were looking at, there is no way they could ever be contrued as being part of the same marque. I wonder if they'll make it as tuner freindly as the mk4? So far, from what I've read, the r35 gtr is no where near as tuner friendly as the previous itterations, saying that though, it may just be early days. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DannoSupra Posted June 24, 2009 Share Posted June 24, 2009 It's a Storm Trooper Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoff Posted June 24, 2009 Share Posted June 24, 2009 I hate that SH-IT (it's something like that ) car. Why can't they crack on with the LF-A, the real Supra-like car an the worthy successor to the name? I dont hate the car but it's the LF-A that really should be classed as the supras successor. If they can get it to go without the problems the prototype has had. And if after 4 years they stop calling it a concept car. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marbleapple Posted June 24, 2009 Share Posted June 24, 2009 I imagine people said the same during the transition from mk3 to mk4. Exactly my thought. The MK4 has become a cult car in my eyes but it doesn't look anythign like the earlier MK3. Why should the MK5? Saying that though, if I had a £ for every time I saw those three pictures with rumours of the 'new' supra I would be a millionaire by now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tbourner Posted June 24, 2009 Share Posted June 24, 2009 Why does it matter if it's the new Supra or not? It's a new Toyota that (IMO) looks nice and has a nice decent amount of power and is a Hybrid so will be cheap on tax! It won't compete with the GTR, but was it supposed to? I thought it was an upgraded Celica more than anything else. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ark Posted June 24, 2009 Author Share Posted June 24, 2009 For it to be the new Supra to me, it needs: - 6 cylinders - toyota build quality - good power - good handling - good looks - modern interior and toys It doesn't have to be the "best" looking or handling car. Doesn't need tonnes of power. It just needs to be a great all round compromise, with all the hallmarks of Toyota/Lexus. Let me put it this way - my new Honda has loads of design and build faults that simply wouldn't exist on a Toyota, and that says it all for me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supra_aero Posted June 24, 2009 Share Posted June 24, 2009 I imagine people said the same during the transition from mk3 to mk4. Look at them side by side, if you didn't know what you were looking at, there is no way they could ever be contrued as being part of the same marque. The thing is the mk3 was based loosely on 1980s corvette styling. The mk4 was based loosely on 1990s F40 styling. Those cars they were based on were uber cool at the time. That however, looks like its carved out of an iceberg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DSK Posted June 24, 2009 Share Posted June 24, 2009 IMO, the 400bhp will be harder work, i.e more revs needed. Whilst I can appreciate the need for hybrid orientated sports cars and the Toyota concept most definately will probably be about the best in this sector, IMO its strayed from the 'supra's' roots. Ideally it needs to have a couple of couple of turbos for the consistent and effortless power across the rev range. Ideally at least 476bhp like the new GTR. Also they need to take a trip down memory lane, see how far advanced and ahead of its time the Supra was with all its clever styling, breath taking brakes that OE, g sensors etc. The GTR and 911 Turbo are just shy of 500bhp, so ideally the Supra needs to be there abouts too with a few good lashings of technology from Toyota's science type bods in white coats. The Supra should always be the 'balls out' flasg ship. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richie-R Posted June 24, 2009 Share Posted June 24, 2009 Anyone take a look at the 086A Coupe, thats very close looking to the MK4. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j80leo Posted June 24, 2009 Share Posted June 24, 2009 Anyone take a look at the 086A Coupe, thats very close looking to the MK4. Just did looks very nice, I love the new supra but it needs more power to keep up with the rest of the super cars. Toyota could always do the same as porsche and keep the same design for years to come! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snooze Posted June 24, 2009 Share Posted June 24, 2009 For it to be the new Supra to me, it needs:......... Good list. The interesting one that I like to throw in is that to be a Supra to me, it has to have 4 seats - even if they're not really practical for adults - if you can put a kid or two in the back, an adult at a push (or even two sideways for short journeys), or just have somewhere to chuck a shopping bag or roadmap - it really adds something. As soon as you drop to 2 seats, you are putting the car in competition with a LOT of alternatives. If the Supra was a 2-seater, it could never have been our only car, and if we go down the route of two cars, then my second, fun, car is probably going to be a little Elise or something, not a big GT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nic Posted June 25, 2009 Share Posted June 25, 2009 R7IHn3UmIDQ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave17 Posted June 25, 2009 Share Posted June 25, 2009 Horrid imo, looks like it has been designed by a child. Far too ugly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Raven Posted June 25, 2009 Share Posted June 25, 2009 (edited) OMD2B4vMaEU&feature=related I will just stick some supra badges on that when it comes out and then i will be happy. 20k for that? Im in Sad day for the name supra, when the new celica looks better Edited June 25, 2009 by The Raven (see edit history) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j1mb0b1 Posted June 25, 2009 Share Posted June 25, 2009 Love live the Mk4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.